EO 13818: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
Publication Date: 12/26/2017
Federal Register: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/swBjwl
PDF: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/kJngVF
EO 13848: Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Publication Date: 09/14/2018
Federal Register: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/4gjWEY
PDF: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/Jpi7QM
EO 13959: Addressing the Threat From Securities Investments That Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies
Publication Date: 11/17/2020
Federal Register: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/tmP2a3
PDF: https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/KliN6v
EO 13818:
TRAFFICKING TUNNELS/DUMBS REMOVAL C BEFORE D QFS ONLINE NESARA/GESARA
RAINBOW CURRENCY MARKERS VERIFIED EBS [ACTIVATED] NATIONAL GUARD [ACTIVATED]-
Not to mention, if Joe Biden is really in control, why hasn't he shut down Durham? I mean, after all, Durham is basically revealing and exposing the corruption between Hillary Clinton Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Here is some perspective to provoke your thoughts regarding special counsel John Durham.
As most of us know or as most of us should know, special counsel John Durham is investigating the spygate scandall.
Spygate: The True Story of Collusion
How America’s most powerful agencies were weaponized against President Donald Trump
Although the details are complex, the structure underlying Spygate—the creation of the false narrative that candidate Donald Trump colluded with Russia, and the spying on his presidential campaign—remains surprisingly simple:
1. CIA Director John Brennan, with some assistance from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, gathered foreign intelligence and fed it throughout our domestic Intelligence Community.
2. The FBI became the handler of Brennan’s intelligence and engaged in the more practical elements of surveillance.
3. The Department of Justice facilitated investigations by the FBI and legal maneuverings while providing a crucial shield of nondisclosure.
4. The Department of State became a mechanism of information dissemination and leaks.
5. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee provided funding, support, and media collusion.
6. Obama administration officials were complicit, and engaged in unmasking and intelligence gathering and dissemination.
7. The media was the most corrosive element in many respects. None of these events could have transpired without their willing participation. Stories were pushed, facts were ignored, and narratives were promoted.
Let’s start with a simple premise: The candidacy of Trump presented both an opportunity and a threat.
Initially not viewed with any real seriousness, Trump’s campaign was seen as an opportunistic wedge in the election process. At the same time, and particularly as the viability of his candidacy increased, Trump was seen as an existential threat to the established political system.
The sudden legitimacy of Trump’s candidacy was not welcomed by the U.S. political establishment. Here was a true political outsider who held no traditional allegiances. He was brash and boastful, he ignored political correctness, he couldn’t be bought, and he didn’t care what others thought of him—he trusted himself.
Governing bodies in Britain and the European Union were also worried. Candidate Trump was openly challenging monetary policy, regulations, and the power of special interests. He challenged Congress. He challenged the United Nations and the European Union. He questioned everything.
CIA Director John Brennan took unofficial foreign intelligence compiled by contacts, colleagues, and associates—primarily from the UK, but also from other Five Eyes members, such as Australia.
In the summer of 2016, Robert Hannigan—head of the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ, Britain’s equivalent of the National Security Agency)—traveled to Washington to meet with Brennan regarding alleged communications between the Trump campaign and Moscow.
On Jan. 23, 2017—three days after Trump’s inauguration—Hannigan abruptly announced his retirement. The Guardian openly speculated that Hannigan’s resignation was directly related to the sharing of UK intelligence.
One method used to help establish evidence of collusion was the employment of “spy traps.” Prominent among these were ones set for Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. The intent was to provide or establish connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. The content and context mattered little as long as a connection could be established that could then be publicized. The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting was another such attempt.
Western intelligence assets were used to initiate and establish these connections, particularly in the cases of Papadopoulos and Page.
Ultimately, Brennan formed an inter-agency task force comprising an estimated six agencies and/or government departments. The FBI, Treasury, and DOJ handled the domestic inquiry into Trump and possible Russia connections. The CIA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Security Agency (NSA) handled foreign and intelligence aspects.
Brennan’s inter-agency task force is not to be confused with the July 2016 FBI counterintelligence investigation, which was formed later at Brennan’s urging.
-
A lot of people don’t seem to grasp how problematic it would be for a president or an attorney general to be caught red-handed interfering with a special counsel’s office investigating what were widely alleged to be serious and historical abuses of federal law enforcement and surveillance powers in the targeting of a political campaign during a presidential election.
The fact is—and it appears many have kind of forgotten about it at this point and need to be reminded—the Department of Justice’s own Inspector General Michael Horowitz released a damning report back in December 2019 (pdf) that overwhelmingly demonstrated that a federal surveillance warrant of a former Trump campaign adviser was granted through deliberate fraud committed against the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) by the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team and the private political operatives they were using as informants.
Not only that, it subsequently turned out these political operatives working as FBI informants were actually paid employees of the other campaign in the 2016 election—that of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
-
The cases that John Durham is showing us with these “indictments” clearly shows the highest levels of the Obama administration were involved in this, including Joe Biden and Obama himself. Multiple agencies from our intelligence community are also complicit. If they truly had any control whatsoever, they would do absolutely anything they could to shut John Durham down, which is my entire point. They clearly don’t have control over John Durham. Why?
So, regarding the above statements, I have some questions.
If Joe Biden is really in control, why hasn't he shut down Durham? I mean, after all, Durham is basically revealing and exposing the corruption between Hillary Clinton Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
These are two logical answers to this question.
1. Joe Biden is not in control.
2. John Durham is working under the protection of the military as being directly commissioned instead of working for the department of Justice.
More specifically, is it possible John Durham has been Direct Commissioned into our military while carrying out his role as special counsel?
Civilians can be direct-commissioned into the military when their skills are critical to sustaining military operations. This is common within the military and would be easy to do under the radar. If John Durham is actually working as a military direct commissioned officer, then it would align with the two logical answers I mentioned above.
-
CURRENT PENDING INDICTMENTS:
Currently, Special Counsel John Durham has issued two indictmetns listed below:
Thursday, September 16, 2021
Grand Jury Indicts D.C. Attorney with Making False Statements to the FBI in 2016 Regarding Alleged Communications Between Trump Organization and Russian Bank
MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN
Grand Jury Indicts D.C. Attorney with Making False Statements to the FBI in 2016 Regarding Alleged Communications Between Trump Organization and Russian Bank
Special Counsel John Durham today announced that a federal grand jury returned an indictment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia charging Michael A. Sussmann, 57, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney, with making a false statement to the FBI on Sept. 19, 2016. The charge in the indictment stems from a set of allegations brought by Sussmann to the FBI related to an alleged secret channel of communications between the Trump Organization and a Russian bank.
Read Full Statement:
https://www.justice.gov/sco/pr/grand-ju ... ng-alleged
-
Thursday, November 4, 2021
Russian National Indicted for Making False Statements to the FBI
Defendant Allegedly Lied About the Source of Information Provided to the FBI During the 2016 Presidential Campaign
IGOR DANCHENKO
Special Counsel John Durham today announced that a federal grand jury returned an indictment in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia charging Igor Danchenko, 43, a Russian citizen residing in Virginia, with five counts of making false statements to the FBI. The charges in the indictment stem from statements made by Danchenko relating to the sources he used in providing information to a U.K. investigative firm that prepared what are identified in the indictment as “Company Reports.”
Read Full Statement:
https://www.justice.gov/sco/pr/russian- ... ements-fbi
-
In closing...
If the same people who will be taken down by John Durham also played a role in the theft of the 2020 election, wouldn’t it make sense for the devolution plan to account for John Durham’s investigation and provide an avenue for it to continue uninterrupted? Commissioning him to the military during a devolution operation would truly move him out of their reach.
