Brunson vs Adams #22-380 Case Denied - Next Steps....

Trevor Winchell For Michigan House of Representatives District 98 - 2022
User avatar
xotrevor
Site Admin
Posts: 2624
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:06 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Brunson vs Adams #22-380 Case Denied - Next Steps....

Post by xotrevor »

As most people know by now, the Brunson vs Adams case was denied by the Supreme Court on Friday, Jan 6th, 2023. It was officially announced in their rulings that was released this morning.

I am not surprised by this, as I believe there would be a 1% chance this would get accepted to move forward.

It was denied for one of two possible reasons:

1. The Supreme Court is corrupt!

2. There is a much bigger plan that involves the military.

Let me be clear, It was not denied because of lack of standing or because of a lack of probable cause.

This case was not about proving there was or was not election fraud. This case was not about flipping the election results, and this case was not about reinstating our duly elected 45th President.

This case was about the fact that 385+ members of congress failed to hold up their oath to defend America and its people from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

This case was about the Brunson brothers requesting a redress of grievances because 385+ members of congress failed to hold up their oath by not allowing the appointment of an Electoral Commission to conduct a 10-day audit of the election results in disputed states.

Several members of congress including U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.).

The senators, led by Cruz, called on the appointment of an Electoral Commission to conduct a 10-day audit of the election results in disputed states to give them time to look into the concerns of the people with the election results regarding thousands of allegations of voter fraud, thousands of voting irregularities. and hundreds of violations and lax enforcement of election law before the election was certified. This request was denied.

These senators issued a statement saying the following:

"America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.

"When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.

"The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.

"Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.

"And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.' That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).

"Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.

"But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.

"Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.

"On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.

"At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

"The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

"In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

"We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission's findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

"Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified' (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

"We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans' faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.

"These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy."


Not to mention the millions of Americans who were at the capitol on January 6th to "peacefully" and "patriotically" protest the outcome of the 2020 election.

This is not the end of the road. The Brunson Brothers are already working on filing a petition, they released this statement earlier today:

We will be filing a petition for reconsideration within the next 30 days which moves the court to reconsider their denial. After it’s filed, it gets docketed, and they set it up again for a closed door hearing. This process takes about 30 days after it's put on the docket.

-Deron Brunson
Trevor Winchell
Site Admin - Investigative Journalist
American Patriots Forum

Information and knowledge becomes powerful only when used to educate and inform others of the truth according to Almighty God!

Return to “Trevor Winchell”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests