Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) interview today on X22 (Comments)
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:42 pm
After listening to the Dave Hayes (Praying Medic) interview today on X22, it makes you wonder why the Durham indictment on Igor Danchenko is 39 pages when a normal indictment is usually 5-6 pages max.
Dave Hayes - A Year Is Almost Up, Something Big Might Happen In January, Timing Is Important
https://url.americanpatriotsforum.com/X22
View Full Danchenko Indictment: https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-relea ... 6/download
Below is an exerp from the indictment...
The Grand Jury Charges that:
I. Introduction and Overview
1. On or about July 31, 2016, the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") opened an investigation known as "Crossfire Hurricane" into whether individuals associated with the Donald J. Trump presidential campaign (the "Trump Campaign") were coordinating activities with the Russian government.
2. Beginning in or about July 2016 and continuing through December 2016, the FBI began receiving a series of reports from a former British government employee ("U.K. Person-I") that contained derogatory information on then-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump") concerning Trump's purported ties to Russia (the "Company Reports").
3. Earlier that year, a U.S.-based international law firm ("Law Firm-I"), acting as counsel to the Hillary Clinton Presidential campaign (the "Clinton Campaign"), had retained a U.S.-based investigative firm ("U.S. Investigative Firm-I") to conduct research on Trump and his associates. In or about June 2016, U.S. Investigative Firm-1, in tum, retained U.K. Person-I, a former officer in a friendly foreign intelligence service ("Foreign Intelligence Service-I"), and his U.K.-based firm ("U.K Investigative Firm-I"), to investigate Trump's purported ties to Russia.
4. During the U.S. presidential election season and afterwards, U .K. Person-I and employees of U.S. Investigative Firm-I provided the Company Reports to multiple media outlets and to U.S. government personnel.
5. The Company Reports played an important role in applications that FBI personnel prepared and submitted to obtain warrants pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") targeting a United States citizen who had been an advisor to then-candidate Trump ("Advisor-I"). In connection with the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation and the later investigation by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III, the FBI relied substantially on the Company Reports in these FISA applications to assert probable cause that Advisor-I was a witting agent of the Russian Federation.
6. The FBI obtained a total of four court-approved FISA applications targeting Advisor-I, which authorized intrusive electronic surveillance of Advisor-I from in or about October 2016 through in or about September 2017. Each of the FISA applications set forth the FBI' s assessment that Advisor-I was a knowing agent of Russia and further alleged - based on the Company Reports - that Advisor-I was part of a "well-coordinated conspiracy of co-operation" between Trump's campaign and the Russian government.
INDICTMENT
Case 1:21-cr-00245-AJT Document 1 Filed 11/03/21 Page 1 of 39 PageID# 1
former officer in a friendly foreign intelligence service ("Foreign Intelligence Service-I"), and his
U.K.-based firm ("U.K Investigative Firm-I"), to investigate Trump's purported ties to Russia.
-
First, DANCHENKO stated falsely that he had never communicated with a particular U.S.-based individual - who was a long-time participant in Democratic Party politics and was then an executive at a U.S. public relations firm ("PR Executive-I") - about any allegations contained in the Company Reports. In truth and in fact, and as DANCHENKO well knew, DANCHENKO sourced one or more specific allegations in the Company Reports anonymously to PR Executive-I.
Second, DANCHENKO stated falsely during the Interviews, that, in or about late July 2016, he received an anonymous phone call from an individual who DANCHENKO believed to be a particular U.S. citizen and who was then president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce ("Chamber President-I"). DANCHENKO also falsely stated that, during this phone call, (i) the person he believed to be Chamber President-I informed him, in part, about information that the Company Reports later described as demonstrating a well-developed "conspiracy of cooperation" between the Trump Campaign and Russian officials, and (ii) DANCHENKO and the aforementioned person agreed to meet in New York. In truth and fact, and as DANCHENKO well knew, DANCHENKO never received such a phone call or such information from any person he believed to be Chamber President-I, and DANCEHNKO never made any arrangements to meet Chamber President-I in New York. Rather, DANCHENKO fabricated these facts regarding Chamber President-I.
As alleged in further detail below, all of DANCHENKO's lies were material to the FBI because, among other reasons, (I) the FBI' s investigation of the Trump Campaign relied in large part on the Company Reports to obtain FISA warrants on Advisor-I, (2) the FBI ultimately devoted substantial resources attempting to investigate and corroborate the allegations contained in the Company Reports, including the reliability of DANCHENKO's sub-sources; and (3) the Company Reports, as well as information collected for the Reports by DANCHENKO, played a role in the FBI's investigative decisions and in sworn representations that the FBI made to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court throughout the relevant time period.