State Sovereignty vs. Federalist Control

Post Reply
User avatar
xotrevor
Site Admin
Posts: 2625
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:06 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

State Sovereignty vs. Federalist Control

Post by xotrevor »

Below is an email I’d gotten years ago and stumbled on it again. What is very interesting about this writing .. is what we have been seeing played out since Pres Trump was in office, is/was the issue of States vs. the Fed. government power. It is very interesting to read it and take a reflection to what Pres. Trump spoke about, in that of Sovereignty.. and what we see happening with the States as Florida and Texas. And yes.. the bottom line is the banking and or bankers cartel. Filthy lucre ; money, especially when gained in a dishonest or dishonorable way. What is meant by filthy lucre in the Bible?

“Filthy lucre” first appeared as a translation from the Greek for something like “shameful or dishonest gain” in the Tyndale Bible, and has been used ever since to describe corrupting money or profit earned in a dishonorable way.

When I first began my studies years ago, and questioned where I should begin.. I thought to myself, what was the most important relevant thing, concept, or thought back at the start of this nation. I said sovereignty, what was it , who was it and began googling it, diffected to many websites and turning stones over. It was what brought me to my life today. I have post here before what Justice Wilson had to say about it in Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 2 Dall. 419 419 (1793).

To say the least, this is an amazing story/movie we are watching, if you can stand back and see the pieces being exposed. I think this writing will help ya al in grasping what it was and is really about and coming about.

District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto

Undoubtedly, the Rothschild brothers financially backed the Federalists, in a similar manner as they backed the Duke of Wellington, Cecil Rhodes, Vladimir Lenin , Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, and many other fascists and megalomaniacs.

But they were not the first to do so. Agents of the Jesuit Order and Jewish Kahal, such as Haym Solomon, had clearly been active in Federalist circles before the Rothschild dynasty were given the reins of financial control.

In any case, the Rothschilds and their agents, the Schiffs and Warburgs, were unquestionably instrumental in formulating the so-called Jekyll Island Agreement, which was the basis for the creation of the private Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Act was passed on December 22, 1913.

Interestingly, this is the time of the Winter Solstice, which is an important day in the Luciferian calendar.

In 1781, Congress established the Office of Finance to save the United States from fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with Superintendent of Finance William Morris and became one of the most effective brokers of bills of exchange to meet federal government expenses. Salomon also personally advanced funds to members of the Continental Congress and other federal officers, charging interest and commissions well below the market rates – Michael Feldberg (Haym Salomon: The Rest of the Story)

James Madison confessed that “I have for some time…been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker”.

Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Constitution according to some historians.

Some claim that he designed the Great Seal of the United States , which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish Star above the eagle’s head design, and it is also on the back of every American one dollar bill.

He believed the United States would become a world power – (Hyam Solomon Bio, Indopedia.org).

The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of the Bank of the United States – G. Edward Griffin (The Creature from Jekyll Island ).

The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a façade to cover their sinister activities.

The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking system of the United States –Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists).

Over the years since N. M. Rothschild…had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S., government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States – Derek Wilson (Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty).

He was lord and master of the money-market of the world, and of course virtuallylord and master of everything else…

He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all countries courted his advice
and were guided by his suggestions – Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minister of England writing on Lord Rothschild).

Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up inEncyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of theVatican Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute
financial power and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the

Roman Catholic Church? – F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil)

The Hofjuden (Court Jews)

Amschel Mayer Rothschild was the father of five sons who would jointly form one of the most powerful banking families in history. Amschel died in 1812, which means he may have conspired with the Federalists who attempted to found the first US federal bank, in 1791. By 1789, he was assisting the House of Hesse and British Crown, with their attempts to undermine Napoleon.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild, took over the reigns from his father. He was a Knight of Malta . Elite Masonic Jews had long worked as money men and advisors to the Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer died in 1855, which means he was in a position to involve himself in the conspiracy to open the second US Federal bank.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London branch of his family’s banking cartel. He was already working in the Stock Exchange from 1804. He established his London bank in 1811. He died in 1836. Of course, long before Nathan’s time, Jewish financiers had been active in England . For example, during the Civil War (1642–1651), Menasseh Ben Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Cromwell.

James Mayer Rothschild was advisor to two French kings. Highly decorated, he and his four brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of Baron by Austria ‘s Francis II (the Holy Roman Emperor). James was also appointed consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823, he was awarded the French Legion of Honor. The predecessors of the Rothschilds were the Hahn family. The Rothschilds are related to the Bauers, Oppenheimers, Warburgs, and Schiffs. These Khazarian families were able lieutenants of royalty, but not the architects of control, as many misinformed authors believe. They exercise enormous influence over the American government by way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such as the Federal Reserve Banks.

The facts show, beyond doubt, that traitorous Nationalists (or should we say Internationalists), such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr, and Biddle, did not have the best interests of ordinary Americans at heart. On the contrary, by way of their Constitution, and later by way of their banks and credit houses, they sought to subjugate and impoverish the citizens of America . In his excellent books entitled The Secret Terrorists and Enemy Unmasked, author Bill Hughes details the strong arm methods used by Biddle to force wary President Andrew Jackson into commissioning the founding of the Federal Bank:

Biddle responded to Jackson refusing to allow him to re-establish the central bank by shrinking the nation’s money supply. He did this by refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies went bankrupt because they could not pay their loans…So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic wars in America.

Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to our country?
Is there not cause to tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war?

Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding themselves in dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and military power of the enemy – President Andrew Jackson.

Because Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and devices of the bankers, he was the victim of an attempted assassination. The gunman was a certain Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin wrote:

Lawrence …boasted to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught – (The Creature from Jekyll Island ).

The Federal bankers caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it that thousands of American businesses were ruined. They funded Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin’s murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious financial organizations that plague the planet, such as the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund), are merely tentacles of the Federal System of the Globalists.

Immense sums belonging to our national depositors have been given to Germany on no collateral security whatsoever…Billions upon billions of our money has been pumped into Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks – H. S. Kenan (The Federal Reserve Bank).

Sir Joseph Stamp was a director of the Bank of England from 1928 to 1941. He openly addressed the colossal power of the Bankers:

The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again…Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and control credit.

President Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and was not the least bit interested in amassing personal wealth. He had no love for the Federal bank, and made his stance clear with these remarks:

I believe that banking institutions are the most dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a moneyed aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.

A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army…We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.


Jefferson ‘s reputation is certainly marred on several accounts, not least by his appointment of British agent Albert Gallatin as Secretary of the Treasury in 1801. In the same year, Gallatin was also appointed Vice President. Regrettably, a statue of the duplicitous Geneva-born Gallatin stands to this day outside the United States Treasury building in Washington DC .

It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton’s banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:

His tontine scheme, fashioned after the British tontine of 1789, involved a system of rights of annual payments to survivors, the annuities therefrom becoming the means of creating a permanent investment class – Frank Bourgin (The Great Challenge: The Myth of Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic).

Political figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real reason for the War of Independence . They knew it had to do with money and usury, and with nationwide colonization, confiscation, and extortion. They knew the conflict was fomented by British and European banks, eager to establish control over America , as they had throughout the world.

This fact is admitted by British agent Benjamin Franklin, whose comment takes us to the heart of the matter:

The inability of the Colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of King George III and the international bankers, was the prime reason for the revolutionary war.

The Colonists were not able to free themselves from the clutches of the international bankers and royal overlords. The War of Independence was not a victory for the citizens of America . On the contrary, it was yet one more victory for the aristocracy that has controlled America from the beginning.

As with the real first bank, the government had been the only depositor to put up any real money, with the remainder being raised from loans the investors made to each other, using the magic of fractional reserve banking. When time came for renewal of the charter, the bankers were warning of bad times ahead if they didn’t get what they wanted. The charter was not renewed. Five month later Britain had attacked America and started the war of 1812 – (Money as History) Few people are aware today that the history of the United States , since the Revolution in 1776, has been, in large part, the story of an epic struggle to get free, and stay free, of control by the European international banks. This struggle was finally lost in 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect the Federal Reserve Act, putting the International Banking Cartel in charge of creating America ‘s money – Paul Grignon (Money as Debt).

Thomas Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the bankers directly, saying desperately:

I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitution – taking from the federal government their power of borrowing.

Thomas Jefferson. Along with William Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams, he put state’s rights before the demands of insatiable Federalists. After Alexander Hamilton’s gang had established the Federal Bank, and the Judiciary with its unlimited power, Jefferson’s illusions concerning America ‘s fate was gone.

In 1821, five years before he died, Thomas Jefferson recorded his misgivings and foreboding:

It has long…been my opinion…that the germ of dissolution of our federal judiciary is in the constitution of the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states, and the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed, because when all government…shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated. Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what road it will pass to destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and then corruption, its necessary consequences.

The following year, Jefferson ‘s insight sharpened all the more. His words reveal the accuracy of his foresight:

If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption… In fact, Jefferson had misgivings about the state of affairs in America many years before he wrote these words. He had been living in France , as minister to that country, between the years 1784 and 1789.

Upon his return to America , he was horrified to see how little effect the grand precepts and provisos of the Declaration of Independence , which he had chiefly formulated, had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:

On arriving in New York and resuming his place in the social life of the country, he was greatly depressed by the discovery that the principles of the Declaration had gone wholly by the board. No one spoke of natural rights and popular sovereignty, it would seem actually that no one had ever heard of them. On the contrary, everyone was talking about the pressing need of a strong central coercive authority, able to check the incursions which the “democratic spirit” was likely to incite upon “the men of principle and property”…Clearly, though the Declaration might have been the charter of American independence, it was in no sense the charter of the new American State – (Our Enemy, the State) Patrick Henry, long time critic of the Constitution’s drafters, also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism of the Federalists:

My great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the means of defending our rights; or of waging war against tyrants…Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the militia, is put into the hands of Congress? – (Speech of 5 June 1788).

Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all?…Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?…Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single example, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the oppressed?

A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny.

Albert Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy in these words:

Nowhere in the history of the constitutional period do we find the faintest suggestion of the Declaration’s doctrine of natural rights, and we find its doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance, but constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. Nowhere do we find a trace of the Declaration’s theory of government, on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated. The new political mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably more close-working and efficient…presenting more attractive possibilities of capture and control – (Our Enemy, the State).

Note the Masonic colors of Maher’s tie. Nothing that governments do is new. Despots within government operate according to plans that are repeated, in various ways, over generations. Their control is aided and abetted by their co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and media spin doctors are instructed by overlords who control the private banks and “philanthropic” foundations.

Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than he who enacts laws – Abraham Lincoln In many cases, the politicians, media men, and bankers are themselves under the tutelage and direction of British and European aristocracy who have made the “board,” so to speak, on which the great geopolitical games are played. The conspirators who organize the game are cautious. They do not want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed. Each group, and each conspirator, knows how vulnerable they are. They know that knowledge of their true allegiances and agendas must never leak out to the masses at large. Their entire success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.

In “Red Dusk and the Morrow”…by Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret Service in Russia , we read that a Lithuanian asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained. The answer was: “Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass stupidity of the Russian people – Denis Fahey (The Rulers of Russia ) The elitist conspirators also know that should civil unrest occur, the masses can be forced back into line by threats to their material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and true, and usually works wonders. As the author Ernest Hemmingway explained:

The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity and both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists. The Trinity of Slavery. The basic diagram shows how the Atonist royals have maintained world control for millennia. By way of theology and politics is the human heart and mind enslaved. Through secret societies, such as Masonry, the royal hierarchy of control is perpetuated and monitored. As French poet Char les Peguy wrote: “Tyranny is always better organized that freedom.” Because of the confessions and evidence provided by intelligent and informed whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty, and masonry, we know a great deal about how the engines of world control operate. However, there are also pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight, and inflexible allegiances and prejudices, attempt to instruct the masses as to the intricacies of world control. When it comes to exposing the dirty little secrets, and the dirty big secrets, of those occupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid, objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred” and inadequate, to say the least.

The philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned her readers of the evils of big government. With great lucidity, she wrote:

Instead of being a protector of man’s rights, the government is becoming their most dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom the government is establishing slavery; instead of protecting men from the initiators of physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion in any manner and issue it pleases; instead of serving as the instrument of objectivity in human relationships, the government is creating a deadly subterranean reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of protecting men from injury by whim, the government is arrogating to itself the power of unlimited whim – so that we are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
Trevor Winchell
Site Admin - Investigative Journalist
American Patriots Forum

Information and knowledge becomes powerful only when used to educate and inform others of the truth according to Almighty God!
Post Reply

Return to “Articles”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest